Open Access Employment Quality as a Determinant of Occupational Stress and Worker Well-Being in Transforming Contemporary Labor Markets

Main Article Content

Authors: Ilunga Kabongo
Authors: Mbuyi Tshisekedi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22865390

Kabongo , I., & Tshisekedi , M. (2026). Employment Quality as a Determinant of Occupational Stress and Worker Well-Being in Transforming Contemporary Labor Markets. Perspectives in Labor Economics Journal , 1(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22865390

Abstract

This paper examines the relationships between job quality, occupational stress, and worker well-being in contemporary labor markets. It adopts a multidimensional perspective in which employment quality is assessed not only through wages and contractual status but also through employment security, working-time arrangements, autonomy, worker voice, psychosocial conditions, organizational support, and opportunities for development. Particular attention is given to the expansion of precarious employment, platform work, remote work, algorithmic management, and digitally mediated forms of labor, which can simultaneously increase flexibility and generate new forms of insecurity, surveillance, work intensification, and boundary erosion. The paper also analyzes the mechanisms through which job demands, effort–reward imbalance, limited control, organizational injustice, bullying, emotional labor, and technostress influence workers’ psychological well-being. Conversely, autonomy, psychological safety, meaningful work, supportive leadership, and adequate organizational resources are identified as important protective factors. The synthesis further shows that interventions focused solely on individual coping are insufficient when occupational stress originates from structural and organizational working conditions. Improving worker well-being therefore requires integrated policies combining organizational reform, appropriate labor regulation, social protection, worker participation, and accessible individual support. The paper consequently argues for a broader assessment of labor-market performance in which job quality constitutes a central dimension alongside employment quantity.

Article Details

References

1. Ahonen, E. Q., Fujishiro, K., Cunningham, T., & Flynn, M. (2018). Work as an inclusive part of population health inequities research and prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 306–311. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304214.

2. Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. doi: 10.1111/joms.12406.

3. Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237–258. doi: 10.1177/1024529420914473.

4. Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381–393. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000062.

5. Aronsson, G., Theorell, T., Grape, T., Hammarström, A., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., Träskman-Bendz, L., & Hall, C. (2017). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health, 17, Article 264. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7.

6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056.

7. Bartlett, L., Martin, A., Neil, A. L., Memish, K., Otahal, P., Kilpatrick, M., & Sanderson, K. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of workplace mindfulness training random-ized controlled trials. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 108–126. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000146.

8. Carolan, S., Harris, P. R., & Cavanagh, K. (2017). Improving employee well-being and effec-tiveness: Systematic review and meta-analysis of web-based psychological interventions de-livered in the workplace. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(7), e271. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7583.

9. Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically re-viewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886.

10. Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work–life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365–381. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x.

11. Davcheva, M., González-Romá, V., Hernández, A., & Tomás, I. (2025). The influence of em-ployment quality on employee health complaints: A parallel mediation model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 40(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1007/s10869-024-09944-9.

12. De Witte, H., Pienaar, J., & De Cuyper, N. (2016). Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and well-being: Is there causal evidence? Australian Psychologist, 51(1), 18–31. doi: 10.1111/ap.12176.

13. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organiza-tions: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.

14. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12258.

15. Edú-Valsania, S., Laguía, A., & Moriano, J. A. (2022). Burnout: A review of theory and meas-urement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031780.

16. El Hamidi, N., & Ed-Dib, M. (2020). Economic empowerment of Moroccan women: An analysis using Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach. Revue Internationale du Chercheur, 1(2), 120–136. Repository doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14279300.

17. El Hamidi, N., Ait Hbibi, A., Makhrout, S., & Choukar, E. (2021). Formalization and institution-al trust: The role of institutional trust in formalizing Morocco’s informal economy. Internation-al Journal of Financial Accountability, Economics, Management, and Auditing, 3(6), 1151–1163. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11473271.

18. Findlay, P., Warhurst, C., Keep, E., & Lloyd, C. (2017). Opportunity knocks? The possibilities and levers for improving job quality. Work and Occupations, 44(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0730888416689813.

19. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychologi-cal safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. doi: 10.1111/peps.12183.

20. Fujii, M. (2024). Employment quality and employees’ health: Evidence from an Internet sur-vey in Japan. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 18(1), 119–141. doi: 10.1007/s42495-023-00122-y.

21. Fujishiro, K., Ahonen, E. Q., & Winkler, M. R. (2022). Investigating employment quality for population health and health equity: A perspective of power. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), Article 9991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169991.

22. Goods, C., Veen, A., & Barratt, T. (2019). “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 502–527. doi: 10.1177/0022185618817069.

23. Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here? Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 323–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111400.

24. Green, F., Lee, S., Zou, M., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Work and life: The relative importance of job quality for general well-being, and implications for social surveys. Socio-Economic Review, 22(2), 835–857. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae002.

25. Harvey, S. B., Modini, M., Joyce, S., Milligan-Saville, J. S., Tan, L., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R. A., Christensen, H., & Mitchell, P. B. (2017). Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic me-ta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 74(4), 301–310. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104015.

26. Inanc, H. (2018). Unemployment, temporary work, and subjective well-being: The gendered effect of spousal labor market insecurity. American Sociological Review, 83(3), 536–566. doi: 10.1177/0003122418772061.

27. Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041826.

28. Joyce, S., Modini, M., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R., Mitchell, P. B., & Harvey, S. B. (2016). Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: A systematic meta-review. Psychological Medicine, 46(4), 683–697. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002408.

29. Kamerāde, D., Wang, S., Burchell, B., Balderson, S. U., & Coutts, A. (2019). A shorter working week for everyone: How much paid work is needed for mental health and well-being? Social Science & Medicine, 241, Article 112353. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.006.

30. Kauhanen, M., & Nätti, J. (2015). Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 783–799. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0617-7.

31. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. doi: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174.

32. Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic re-view and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812. doi: 10.1002/job.2167.

33. Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065.

34. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. doi: 10.1002/wps.20311.

35. Memish, K., Martin, A., Bartlett, L., Dawkins, S., & Sanderson, K. (2017). Workplace mental health: An international review of guidelines. Preventive Medicine, 101, 213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.03.017.

36. Milner, A., Krnjacki, L., & LaMontagne, A. D. (2017). Psychosocial job quality and mental health among young workers: A fixed-effects regression analysis using 13 waves of annual data. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 43(1), 50–58. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3608.

37. Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An inves-tigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 5911. doi: 10.3390/su12155911.

38. Nielsen, K., & Miraglia, M. (2017). What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the “what works?” question in organizational intervention research. Human Relations, 70(1), 40–62. doi: 10.1177/0018726716670226.

39. Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. V. (2018). What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: An overview of the literature and agenda for future research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 42, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.007.

40. Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., Stuckey, R., Graham, M., & Weale, V. (2020). A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: How do we optimise health? BMC Pub-lic Health, 20, Article 1825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z.

41. Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design re-search: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420. doi: 10.1037/apl0000106.

42. Peckham, T., Fujishiro, K., Hajat, A., Flaherty, B. P., & Seixas, N. (2019). Evaluating employ-ment quality as a determinant of health in a changing labor market. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(4), 258–281. doi: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.09.

43. Piasna, A. (2018). Scheduled to work hard: The relationship between non-standard working hours and work intensity among European workers (2005–2015). Human Resource Man-agement Journal, 28(1), 167–181. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12171.

44. Piasna, A. (2024). Algorithms of time: How algorithmic management changes the temporali-ties of work and prospects for working time reduction. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 48(1), 115–132. doi: 10.1093/cje/bead017.

45. Picatoste, X., Aceleanu, M. I., & Șerban, A. C. (2021). Job quality and well-being in OECD countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 681–703. doi: 10.3846/tede.2021.14731.

46. Rugulies, R., Aust, B., & Madsen, I. E. H. (2017). Effort–reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 43(4), 294–306. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3632.

47. Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. (2017). Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies. PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0185781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185781.

48. Schneider, D., & Harknett, K. (2019). Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and well-being. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 82–114. doi: 10.1177/0003122418823184.

49. Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). De-pendence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49(5–6), 833–861. doi: 10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y.

50. Siegrist, J., & Li, J. (2016). Associations of extrinsic and intrinsic components of work stress with health: A systematic review of evidence on the effort-reward imbalance model. Interna-tional Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(4), Article 432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040432.

51. Sonnentag, S., Tay, L., & Nesher Shoshan, H. (2023). A review on health and well-being at work: More than stressors and strains. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 473–510. doi: 10.1111/peps.12572.

52. Steffgen, G., Sischka, P. E., & Fernandez de Henestrosa, M. (2020). The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A multidimensional approach of job quality and its links to well-being at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), Article 7771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217771.

53. Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman-Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., & Hall, C. (2015). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health, 15, Article 738. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4.

54. Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. An-nual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.

55. Van Aerden, K., Moors, G., Levecque, K., & Vanroelen, C. (2015). The relationship between employment quality and work-related well-being in the European labor force. Journal of Vo-cational Behavior, 86, 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.001.

56. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of Self-Determination Theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. doi: 10.1177/0149206316632058.

57. Verkuil, B., Atasayi, S., & Molendijk, M. L. (2015). Workplace bullying and mental health: A meta-analysis on cross-sectional and longitudinal data. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0135225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135225.

58. Vonderlin, R., Biermann, M., Bohus, M., & Lyssenko, L. (2020). Mindfulness-based programs in the workplace: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mindfulness, 11(7), 1579–1598. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01328-3.

59. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. doi: 10.1111/apps.12290.

60. Wang, S., Kamerāde, D., Burchell, B., Coutts, A., & Balderson, S. U. (2022). What matters more for employees’ mental health: Job quality or job quantity? Cambridge Journal of Eco-nomics, 46(2), 251–274. doi: 10.1093/cje/beab054.

61. Warhurst, C., Knox, A., & Wright, S. (2025). Developing a standard measure of job quality. Work, Employment and Society, 39(4), 927–948. doi: 10.1177/09500170251325774.

62. Wheatley, D. (2017). Autonomy in paid work and employee subjective well-being. Work and Occupations, 44(3), 296–328. doi: 10.1177/0730888417697232.

63. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1177/0950017018785616.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.