Open Access How Technological Transformation Reshapes Employment

Main Article Content

Authors: Hamisi Mwinyi
Authors: Rashid Mfaume
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22833899

Mwinyi , H., & Mfaume , R. (2026). How Technological Transformation Reshapes Employment. Perspectives in Labor Economics Journal , 1(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22833899

Abstract

This paper examines how digitalization, automation, artificial intelligence and emerging forms of work are transforming the structure of employment. It synthesizes recent contributions on the effects of technological change on job creation, task displacement, occupational restructuring, skill requirements, wage inequality and employment organization. The analysis shows that technological change does not generate uniform labor-market outcomes. Automation and digital technologies can substitute for routine tasks and weaken labor demand in exposed occupations, while simultaneously increasing productivity, supporting firm expansion and creating new tasks requiring complementary human capabilities. These transformations also modify the composition of labor demand by increasing the importance of analytical, digital, social and adaptive skills. At the same time, platform work, algorithmic management and remote employment are redefining workplace organization, autonomy and labor relations. The paper further highlights the distributional consequences of technological transformation, particularly for workers facing limited opportunities for retraining or occupational mobility. Overall, the findings suggest that the employment effects of digitalization depend on the interaction between technological adoption, human-capital adjustment, organizational adaptation and labor-market institutions. Policies supporting lifelong learning, digital inclusion, occupational mobility and worker protection are therefore central to promoting a more inclusive transition toward increasingly technology-intensive labor markets.

Article Details

References

1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20160696.

2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3.

3. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Jour-nal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. DOI: 10.1086/705716.

4. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022a). Tasks, automation, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA19815.

5. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022b). Demographics and automation. The Review of Eco-nomic Studies, 89(1), 1–44. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdab031.

6. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Hazell, J., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evi-dence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1), S293–S340. DOI: 10.1086/718327.

7. Adachi, D., Kawaguchi, D., & Saito, Y. U. (2024). Robots and employment: Evidence from Ja-pan, 1978–2017. Journal of Labor Economics, 42(2), 591–634. DOI: 10.1086/723205.

8. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31–50. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.2.31.

9. Ait Hbibi, A., Makhrout, S., Choukar, E., & El Hamidi, N. (2021). Financial inclusion of the in-formal sector through FinTech: What perspective does the Diffusion of Innovation offer? In-ternational Journal of Information Technology and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 184–190. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11479385.

10. Ait Hbibi, A., Makhrout, S., Errassaa, N., & El Hamidi, N. (2024). Digitalization of SMEs in Mo-rocco: Determinants of Business-to-Business (B2B) Fintech platform adoption. International Journal of Strategic Management and Economic Studies, 3(1), 501–513. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13993299.

11. Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The skill complementarity of broadband in-ternet. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1781–1824. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjv028.

12. Aksoy, C. G., Özcan, B., & Philipp, J. (2021). Robots and the gender pay gap in Europe. Euro-pean Economic Review, 134, Article 103693. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103693.

13. Albinowski, M., & Lewandowski, P. (2024). The impact of ICT and robots on labour market outcomes of demographic groups in Europe. Labour Economics, 87, Article 102481. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102481.

14. Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237–258. DOI: 10.1177/1024529420914473.

15. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2017). Revisiting the risk of automation. Economics Let-ters, 159, 157–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.001.

16. Atalay, E., Phongthiengtham, P., Sotelo, S., & Tannenbaum, D. (2020). The evolution of work in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(2), 1–34. DOI: 10.1257/app.20190070.

17. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. DOI: 10.1257/jep.29.3.3.

18. Autor, D. H. (2019). Work of the past, work of the future. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 1–32. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20191110.

19. Autor, D., Chin, C., Salomons, A., & Seegmiller, B. (2024). New frontiers: The origins and con-tent of new work, 1940–2018. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 139(3), 1399–1465. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae008.

20. Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 645–709. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjaa004.

21. Balsmeier, B., & Woerter, M. (2019). Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction. Research Policy, 48(8), Article 103765. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.010.

22. Bárány, Z. L., & Siegel, C. (2018). Job polarization and structural change. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(1), 57–89. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20150258.

23. Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2023). The evolution of work from home. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 23–50. DOI: 10.1257/jep.37.4.23.

24. Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630, 920–925. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2.

25. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju032.

26. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae044.

27. Caselli, F., & Manning, A. (2019). Robot arithmetic: New technology and wages. American Economic Review: Insights, 1(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20170036.

28. Cheng, H., Jia, R., Li, D., & Li, H. (2019). The rise of robots in China. Journal of Economic Per-spectives, 33(2), 71–88. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.2.71.

29. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity ef-fects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3251.

30. Cortes, G. M. (2016). Where have the middle-wage workers gone? A study of polarization us-ing panel data. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1), 63–105. DOI: 10.1086/682289.

31. Cortes, G. M., Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. E. (2017). Disappearing routine jobs: Who, how, and why? Journal of Monetary Economics, 91, 69–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.09.006.

32. Cortes, G. M., Jaimovich, N., Nekarda, C. J., & Siu, H. E. (2020). The dynamics of disappearing routine jobs: A flows approach. Labour Economics, 65, Article 101823. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101823.

33. Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., Suedekum, J., & Woessner, N. (2021). The adjustment of labor mar-kets to robots. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(6), 3104–3153. DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvab012.

34. de Vries, G. J., Gentile, E., Miroudot, S., & Wacker, K. M. (2020). The rise of robots and the fall of routine jobs. Labour Economics, 66, Article 101885. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101885.

35. Deming, D. J. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The Quar-terly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjx022.

36. Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965–2005. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjaa021.

37. Deming, D., & Kahn, L. B. (2018). Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evi-dence from job postings for professionals. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), S337–S369. DOI: 10.1086/694106.

38. Dengler, K., & Matthes, B. (2018). The impacts of digital transformation on the labour mar-ket: Substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 304–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.024.

39. Dettling, L. J. (2017). Broadband in the labor market: The impact of residential high-speed internet on married women's labor force participation. ILR Review, 70(2), 451–482. DOI: 10.1177/0019793916644721.

40. Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189, Article 104235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235.

41. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12258.

42. Felten, E. W., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal, 42(12), 2195–2217. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3286.

43. Feng, A., & Graetz, G. (2020). Training requirements, automation, and job polarisation. The Economic Journal, 130(631), 2249–2271. DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueaa044.

44. Fonseca, T., Lima, F., & Pereira, S. C. (2018). Job polarization, technological change and rou-tinization: Evidence for Portugal. Labour Economics, 51, 317–339. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2018.02.003.

45. Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J. E., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D. J., Feldman, M., Groh, M., Lobo, J., Moro, E., Wang, D., Youn, H., & Rahwan, I. (2019). Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(14), 6531–6539. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900949116.

46. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.

47. Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718790002.

48. Golden, T. D., & Eddleston, K. A. (2020). Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. Journal of Vocational Be-havior, 116, Article 103348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103348.

49. Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00754.

50. Hershbein, B., & Kahn, L. B. (2018). Do recessions accelerate routine-biased technological change? Evidence from vacancy postings. American Economic Review, 108(7), 1737–1772. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161570.

51. Heß, P., Janssen, S., & Leber, U. (2023). The effect of automation technology on workers' training participation. Economics of Education Review, 96, Article 102438. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102438.

52. Hjort, J., & Poulsen, J. (2019). The arrival of fast internet and employment in Africa. Ameri-can Economic Review, 109(3), 1032–1079. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161385.

53. Innocenti, S., & Golin, M. (2022). Human capital investment and perceived automation risks: Evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195, 27–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.027.

54. Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056.

55. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174.

56. Koch, M., Manuylov, I., & Smolka, M. (2021). Robots and firms. The Economic Journal, 131(638), 2553–2584. DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueab009.

57. Modestino, A. S., Shoag, D., & Ballance, J. (2020). Upskilling: Do employers demand greater skill when workers are plentiful? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(4), 793–805. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00835.

58. Reijnders, L. S. M., & de Vries, G. J. (2018). Technology, offshoring and the rise of non-routine jobs. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 412–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.009.

59. Schmidpeter, B., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2021). Automation, unemployment, and the role of la-bor market training. European Economic Review, 137, Article 103808. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103808.

60. Thuemmel, U. (2023). Optimal taxation of robots. Journal of the European Economic Associa-tion, 21(3), 1154–1190. DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvac062.

61. Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. An-nual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.

62. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. DOI: 10.1177/0950017018785616.

63. Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among infor-mation workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 43–54. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.