Organizational Architecture, Hybrid Financing, and Sustainable Business Models for the Long-Term Viability of Social Enterprises
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social enterprises operate at the intersection of commercial activity and social purpose, creating organizational and financial arrangements that differ from those of conventional firms and nonprofit organizations. This paper reviews the literature on the organizational, financial and sustainability dimensions that influence the long-term viability of social enterprises. The analysis is structured around three complementary perspectives: organizational hybridity and social-enterprise architecture, hybrid financing and resource mobilization, and sustainable organizational models. The literature shows that the durability of social enterprises depends on their capacity to manage competing institutional logics, protect mission integrity, establish legitimacy and adapt governance structures to changing environments. Financial sustainability similarly depends on diversified resource portfolios combining commercial revenues, grants, investment capital, crowdfunding, impact investment and relational resources while maintaining alignment between investors and organizational missions. At the business-model level, sustainability requires coherent integration of economic, social and environmental value creation rather than the addition of social objectives to conventional commercial structures. The reviewed contributions consequently suggest that social-enterprise sustainability results from the interaction of governance, financing, stakeholder relationships, organizational capabilities and business-model design. Long-term viability therefore requires organizational arrangements capable of preserving social purpose while supporting economic continuity and wider social and environmental transformation
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
1. André, K., & Pache, A.-C. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 659–675. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2445-8
2. Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: How stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589–611. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1
3. Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, 11(4), 1091. doi:10.3390/su11041091
4. Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0903
5. Bengo, I., Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Calderini, M. (2016). Indicators and metrics for social business: A review of current approaches. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/19420676.2015.1049286
6. Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2017). Profit with purpose? A theory of social enterprise. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 19–58. doi:10.1257/pol.20150495
7. Block, J. H., Hirschmann, M., & Fisch, C. (2021). Which criteria matter when impact investors screen social enterprises? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101813. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101813
8. Brandstetter, L., & Lehner, O. M. (2015). Opening the market for impact investments: The need for adapted portfolio tools. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 87–107. doi:10.1515/erj-2015-0003
9. Bull, M., & Ridley-Duff, R. (2019). Towards an appreciation of ethics in social enterprise business models. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 619–634. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3794-5
10. Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738–767. doi:10.1111/joms.12201
11. Calvo, S., & Morales, A. (2016). Sink or swim: Social enterprise as a panacea for non-profit organisations? Journal of International Development, 28(7), 1170–1188. doi:10.1002/jid.3138
12. Castellas, E. I.-P., Ormiston, J., & Findlay, S. (2018). Financing social entrepreneurship: The role of impact investment in shaping social enterprise in Australia. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(2), 130–155. doi:10.1108/SEJ-02-2017-0006
13. Cetindamar, D., & Ozkazanc-Pan, B. (2017). Assessing mission drift at venture capital impact investors. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(3), 257–270. doi:10.1111/beer.12149
14. Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, C. L. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the litera-ture. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135–173. doi:10.1515/erj-2014-0011
15. Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. F., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 58(5), 1294–1330. doi:10.1111/joms.12640
16. Davies, I. A., & Doherty, B. (2019). Balancing a hybrid business model: The search for equi-librium at Cafédirect. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1043–1066. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3960-9
17. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social en-terprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
18. Di Lorenzo, F., & Scarlata, M. (2019). Social enterprises, venture philanthropy and the allevia-tion of income inequality. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 307–323. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4049-1
19. Dickerson, J. P., & Hassanien, A. (2018). Restaurants’ social enterprise business model: Three case studies. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 19(2), 192–216. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2017.1363009
20. Doherty, B., & Kittipanya-Ngam, P. (2021). The role of social enterprise hybrid business models in inclusive value chain development. Sustainability, 13(2), 499. doi:10.3390/su13020499
21. Dohrmann, S., Raith, M., & Siebold, N. (2015). Monetizing social value creation—A business model approach. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 127–154. doi:10.1515/erj-2013-0074
22. Errassaa, N., El Hamidi, N., Ait Hbibi, A., & Makhrout, S. (2023). The intention of Moroccan SMEs to adopt crowdfunding in response to failures of the traditional banking system: An analysis of the determinants. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(1), 91–102. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13993382
23. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for crea-tion of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608. doi:10.1002/bse.1939
24. Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of cau-tion: A review of the literature on social impact bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 4–28. doi:10.1111/spol.12260
25. Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401–416. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
26. Gidron, B. (2017). The dual hybridity of social enterprises for marginalized populations. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/19420676.2016.1207700
27. Glänzel, G., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). Social impact investing in Germany: Current impediments from investors’ and social entrepreneurs’ perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1638–1668. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9621-z
28. Guo, B., & Peng, S. (2020). Do nonprofit and for-profit social enterprises differ in financing? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(3), 521–532. doi:10.1007/s11266-020-00218-5
29. Gupta, P., Beninger, S., & Ganesh, J. (2015). A hybrid approach to innovation by social enter-prises: Lessons from Africa. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(1), 89–112. doi:10.1108/SEJ-04-2014-0023
30. Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209–229. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.032
31. Haigh, N., Kennedy, E. D., & Walker, J. (2015). Hybrid organizations as shape-shifters: Alter-ing legal structure for strategic gain. California Management Review, 57(3), 59–82. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.59
32. Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4
33. He, T., Liu, M. J., Phang, C. W., & Luo, J. (2022). Toward social enterprise sustainability: The role of digital hybridity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121360. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121360
34. Hestad, D., Tàbara, J. D., & Thornton, T. F. (2021). The three logics of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations: A multi-disciplinary review. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 647–661. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00883-x
35. Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the way in which value is created in the context of social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62–80. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12113
36. Hockerts, K. (2015). How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementari-ties. California Management Review, 57(3), 83–106. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83
37. Hockerts, K., Hehenberger, L., Schaltegger, S., & Farber, V. (2022). Defining and conceptual-izing impact investing: Attractive nuisance or catalyst? Journal of Business Ethics, 179(4), 937–950. doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05157-3
38. Höchstädter, A. K., & Scheck, B. (2015). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 449–475. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2327-0
39. Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2015). Identifying, mapping, and monitoring the impact of hybrid firms. California Management Review, 57(3), 107–125. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.107
40. Jayawardhana, K., Fernando, S., & Siyambalapitiya, J. (2022). Sustainability in social enter-prise research: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–10. doi:10.1177/21582440221123200
41. Jayawarna, D., Jones, O., & Macpherson, A. (2020). Resourcing social enterprises: The role of socially oriented bootstrapping. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 56–79. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12334
42. Joy, M., Poonamallee, L., & Scillitoe, J. L. (2024). What to be (or not to be): Understanding le-gal structure choices of social enterprises from a resource dependence perspective. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 712–743. doi:10.1080/19420676.2021.1995030
43. Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
44. Kannothra, C. G., Manning, S., & Haigh, N. (2018). How hybrids manage growth and social–business tensions in global supply chains: The case of impact sourcing. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 271–290. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4
45. Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Halberstadt, J., Shaw, E., & Syrjä, P. (2017). Social entrepreneurship orientation: Development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(6), 977–997. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0206
46. Kwong, C., Tasavori, M., & Cheung, C. W.-M. (2017). Bricolage, collaboration and mission drift in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(7–8), 609–638. doi:10.1080/08985626.2017.1328904
47. Lee, I. (2015). A social enterprise business model for social entrepreneurs: Theoretical foun-dations and model development. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Inno-vation, 3(4), 269–301. doi:10.1504/IJSEI.2015.069351
48. Lee, M., & Jay, J. (2015). Strategic responses to hybrid social ventures. California Manage-ment Review, 57(3), 126–147. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.126
49. Littlewood, D., & Holt, D. (2018). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the in-fluence of environment. Business & Society, 57(3), 525–561. doi:10.1177/0007650315613293
50. López-Cózar, C., & Priede, T. (2015). Identification of the main sources of financing currently used by social enterprises. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 15(1), 41–59. doi:10.7201/earn.2015.01.03
51. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., & Breuer, H. (2018). The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 145–162. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004
52. Lyon, F., & Owen, R. (2019). Financing social enterprises and the demand for social invest-ment. Strategic Change, 28(1), 47–57. doi:10.1002/jsc.2245
53. Maibom, C., & Smith, P. (2016). Symbiosis across institutional logics in a social enterprise. So-cial Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 260–280. doi:10.1108/SEJ-02-2016-0002
54. Margiono, A., Zolin, R., & Chang, A. (2018). A typology of social venture business model con-figurations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 626–650. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-09-2016-0316
55. Martin, M. (2015). Building impact businesses through hybrid financing. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 109–126. doi:10.1515/erj-2015-0005
56. Mason, C., & Doherty, B. (2016). A fair trade-off? Paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 451–469. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2511-2
57. Meyskens, M., & Bird, L. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Re-search Journal, 5(2), 155–166. doi:10.1515/erj-2015-0007
58. Mikołajczak, P. (2020). Social enterprises’ hybridity in the concept of institutional logics: Evi-dence from Polish NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Or-ganizations, 31(3), 472–483. doi:10.1007/s11266-020-00195-9
59. Mitzinneck, B. C., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Managing value tensions in collective social en-trepreneurship: The role of temporal, structural, and collaborative compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 381–400. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2
60. Moran, M., & Ward-Christie, L. (2022). Blended social impact investment transactions: Why are they so complex? Journal of Business Ethics, 179(4), 1011–1031. doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05153-7
61. Muñoz, P., & Kibler, E. (2016). Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1314–1318. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.098
62. Olofsson, S., Hoveskog, M., & Halila, F. (2018). Journey and impact of business model innova-tion: The case of a social enterprise in the Scandinavian electricity retail market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 70–81. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.081
63. Ometto, P., Gegenhuber, T., Winter, J., & Greenwood, R. (2019). From balancing missions to mission drift: The role of the institutional context, spaces, and compartmentalization in the scaling of social enterprises. Business & Society, 58(5), 1003–1046. doi:10.1177/0007650318758329
64. Park, J. H., & Bae, Z.-T. (2020). Legitimation of social enterprises as hybrid organizations. Sustainability, 12(18), 7583. doi:10.3390/su12187583
65. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and so-cial entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. doi:10.1177/1059601114560063
66. Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders matter: How social enterprises address mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 307–322. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y
67. Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115. doi:10.1177/1042258717727718
68. Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. doi:10.1177/0149206318793196
69. Salido-Andres, N., Garcia-Rodriguez, I., & Cachero-Martinez, S. (2022). Connecting social en-terprises and sustainable consumption: Systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and concep-tual framework. Sustainability, 14(20), 13428. doi:10.3390/su142013428
70. Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36
71. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289. doi:10.1177/1086026616633272
72. Schätzlein, L., Schlütter, D., & Hahn, R. (2023). Managing the external financing constraints of social enterprises: A systematic review of a diversified research landscape. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 176–199. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12310
73. Shahi, R., & Parekh, N. (2022). Financing social enterprises: An upper echelon perspective. FIIB Business Review, 11(2), 235–250. doi:10.1177/23197145211033092
74. Siegner, M., Pinkse, J., & Panwar, R. (2018). Managing tensions in a social enterprise: The complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. Journal of Clean-er Production, 174, 1314–1324. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076
75. Simatele, M., & Dlamini, P. (2020). Finance and the social mission: A quest for sustainability and inclusion. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(2), 225–242. doi:10.1108/QRFM-02-2019-0024
76. Singh, S., Syed, A. A., Tariq, M., Dalwai, T., & Ananda, S. (2025). Financial dimensions of so-cial enterprises: An integrative review and thematic mapping of the literature. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101032. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101032
77. Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44. doi:10.1177/0001839217750826
78. Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of In-ternational Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331. doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.38
79. Touil, A., Babounia, A., & El Hamidi, N. (2024). How does adopting sustainable supply chain quality management improve corporate financial performance? A transaction cost perspec-tive. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(3), 170–186. doi:10.21511/imfi.21(3).2024.15
80. Vial, V. (2016). A business model canvas for social enterprises. Sains Humanika, 8(1–2), 1–8. doi:10.11113/sh.v8n1-2.825